Talk:Very Short Snippets: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "I feel like this page doesn’t make very much sense because there are some short snippets under 10 seconds that are definitely not from popular musical pieces, like Complex and Fairlight Demo, so I feel like the page should be deleted or something or have the time changed to something like under 3 seconds.") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I feel like this page doesn’t make very much sense because there are some short snippets under 10 seconds that are definitely not from popular musical pieces, like Complex and Fairlight Demo, so I feel like the page should be deleted or something or have the time changed to something like under 3 seconds. | I feel like this page doesn’t make very much sense because there are some short snippets under 10 seconds that are definitely not from popular musical pieces, like Complex and Fairlight Demo, so I feel like the page should be deleted or something or have the time changed to something like under 3 seconds. | ||
:It's only your opinion, since even being a 1 second snippet of a popular song it couldn't make to count as a Lostwave. All snippets, even if it is a part of a only available copy of a song if it dures less than a few seconds can't be counted as a Lostwave since it's not even enough to classify it as a fragment. -- [[User:LB-LM|LB-LM]] ([[User talk:LB-LM|talk]]) 23:57, 3 July 2024 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 22:57, 3 July 2024
I feel like this page doesn’t make very much sense because there are some short snippets under 10 seconds that are definitely not from popular musical pieces, like Complex and Fairlight Demo, so I feel like the page should be deleted or something or have the time changed to something like under 3 seconds.
- It's only your opinion, since even being a 1 second snippet of a popular song it couldn't make to count as a Lostwave. All snippets, even if it is a part of a only available copy of a song if it dures less than a few seconds can't be counted as a Lostwave since it's not even enough to classify it as a fragment. -- LB-LM (talk) 23:57, 3 July 2024 (EDT)